Here is the average score out of 4 for the video, based on mine and Farina's personal assessment as well as Mr. Bush and the class's. Below each level descriptor is the overall reason for the ranking.
A - Aesthetics : 2/4
included a summary of key ideas, however couldn't be credited for any effects due to too much secondary work being used.
C - Creativity : 1+/4
Little creativity was shown due to the fact that just research was carried out on the internet - about the internet, rather than primarily filming or typing up information ourselves.
T - Technology : 2/4
I successfully managed to upload to YouTube and embed the video on my blog, was of high quality most times and had good music. Showed experience of using movie editor (Sony vegas)
U - Understanding : 3/4
This was the strongest part of the video, as we managed to identified what the class needs to know and managed to put together successfully an informative video on the changes the internet has caused,
P - Production Values : 2/4 Was well edited, however not proven to be very ambitious as it was secondary work; managed to edit clips in well to present a good standard - with some good transitions on screen and audio.
Total: 10/20 = 50%
Overall summary of results
WWW: There was a pretty strong understanding of what needed to be gathered and presented.
The music was appropriate, the clip was longer than 1 minute.
The secondary research was relevant and informative.
EBI: More of an original approach was used - i.e. not to copy and paste and then edit chunks, be more creative with it, and use more of our own work.
Use a camera to record by ourselves.
